|
|
|
| 0 |
  |
|
Actually, Rich Howard was fund manager of PRWCX until August 1, 2001 when he turned the fund over to Stephen Boesel. Although subsequent fund managers have done a credible job, Howard was one of a kind and is mostly responsible for the awesome historical record and reputation for capital preservation that PRWCX enjoys today. His knowledge and acumen for investing in convertible securities probably rivals that of the legendary John Calamos. It was a sad day when Howard left the TRP firm.
Here is a link to his final commentary: Rich Howard Farewell Here's a cut/paste of the last few paragraphs, my favorites.
CAUTION, SECURITIES ANALYSTS AT WORK
The great stock market crash of 1929 and the economic depression that followed provided a stimulus to systematize security analysis. Such fundamental subjects as asset-class differentiation, the impact of economic forces on corporate results, and the interplay of balance sheets and income statements began to be studied in a rigorous manner. The major role of psychology and related behavior in securities markets was also recognized. Speculators, investors, brokers, insiders, managers, outside experts, and government all brought motivation to their decisions and roles.
By the 1970s, when I became a chartered financial analyst (CFA), there totaled fewer than 5,000 analysts so qualified, but the profession, with its significant body of knowledge, was truly launched. The securities industry has steadily evolved--a recent full disclosure ruling, which attempts to give all investors equal access to all information, has been a notable development. However, perhaps the biggest change I see is the sheer number of analysts themselves. This year alone over 86,000 hopefuls (including my son) took the CFA exams!
Many, of course, will search for the truth, driven by intellectual curiosity, professional pride, and honest greed. Some also are lazy. Instead of developing a rigorous understanding of the elements that go into corporate earnings, lesser analysts simply look at the bottom line itself and seek out the honey pot of high earnings growth. Many corporate managements recognize and--even worse--embrace this glossed-over view, allowing their reported results to be manipulated to generate the rosiest possible output at the expense of common sense. Huge companies exposed to the vagaries of the world economy simply do not grow their earnings consistently at 12% quarter after quarter. Yet by reporting such numbers--even if misleading and basically dishonest--managers can be lauded and paid handsome bonuses while watching their shares accorded high valuations. Security analysis has gone from evaluating corporate performance to dictating what is often reported as performance. When and how this will change I don't know--but reality remains reality and eventually it will assert itself. We continue to consider the economy, interest rates, and stock valuations as the bare necessities in the outlook for financial markets and your fund. As usual, there are many positives and negatives related to these building blocks, but it's always important to remember the obvious. The time to buy is when most other investors want to sell, and they want to sell when they perceive a poor outlook. This sort of discipline is what allows an investor to qualify as a "rightful owner," as defined by Mr. Baruch.
The economy seems a particular negative going into the second half of 2001. Its weakness, exacerbated by a drastic drop-off in technology spending, has significantly contributed to poor corporate earnings performance. Vicious competition has hurt areas burdened with excessive overcapacity. Historical experience suggests that sometime in the next 12 months, perhaps even tomorrow, the economy will start turning up. Of course, once it does and people recognize the change, it may be too late to benefit--equity prices will probably be significantly above their lows.
..............................................
The time to buy is when most other investors want to sell, and they want to sell when they perceive a poor outlook.
..............................................
Interest rates are a strong positive. Rate cuts reduce corporate expenses by billions, boosting earnings. Lower rates also heighten investor interest in equities over fixed-income securities. Furthermore, the Fed's easy-money policy is probably not over. Stock market valuation significantly improved over the past 18 months. It is, however, still not particularly good. Comparisons to historic average price/earnings ratios, book values, and dividend yields all suggest that stocks remain expensive. Some of this higher valuation makes sense given the steady decline of inflation over the past 20 years--but even that positive is two-sided. Inflation is not likely to fall much from today's low level, and it might well go up.
Investor psychology, while not one of my three primary outlook factors, seems especially important today. Disappointing stock market returns over the last 15 months have caused the public to dramatically slow its buying of mutual funds. If, however, disappointment leads to a loss of faith in future returns, we might expect outright redemptions. That's when you find yourself facing not a Winnie-the-Pooh sort of bear market, but a grizzly. Given the above discussion, you should not be surprised that we expect an unexciting stock market going forward. Of course, this was also my conclusion six months ago and, while largely correct, it didn't prevent your fund from performing well. We have used sensible criteria to choose what we own, and we understand what we own. We have a quality organization that supports our work. We face the uncertain future with confidence.
A PERSONAL NOTE ---------------
After 12-1/2 years as your portfolio manager, I will be turning over the Capital Appreciation Fund to Stephen W. Boesel on August 1, 2001. Steve is a well-seasoned veteran whose cautious style and talents are appropriate for this fund. As for myself, a career change is in order--one that (mercifully for investors) will not involve developing shareholder reports with themes such as bears, pilots, sailors, or other assorted topics. In closing, I'd like to thank each of you for your investment in the fund and the confidence thereby expressed in T. Rowe Price.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/
Richard P. Howard
|
Related Topics
Capital Appreciation
randan
05-09-2008, 2:44 PM | Post #2516244
| 0 |
  |
|
Thanks for the clarification Steve. I thought I had pulled that from the Prospector website but maybe I misquoted. As to convertibles, it does have double the exposure to convertibles as does PRWCX currently. They also offer a small cap fund and expenses on both are pretty high at the moment although assets under management are negligible. Dan Edited to include: Steve, I read your comments over on the CEF forum and elsewhere and respect the knowledge you appear to have on various instruments. Do you have any thoughts on TPSMX (Transamerica Premier Small Cap)? I just opened a small position as my only small cap fund. I really like its' low expense ratio and returns have been very good since inception. It seems to have some good valuation characteristics although it trailing p/e ratio is over 21. Thanks.
|
Related Topics
PRWCX
| 0 |
  |
|
Hi Dan, Thanks for the tip on the Prospector funds and especially on Transamerica's TPSMX. Much appreciated! I've never heard of the fund before but at first glance it's very interesting. I like the seven shipping stocks, comprising over 20% of the portfolio, in the top 25 holdings: ANW, EXM, GNK, TNK, ONAV, GASS, and GMR. M* shows the minimum investment as $250K, but I assume that is incorrect? Scottrade shows TPSMX as available for a $17 transaction fee. Best, Steve
|
Related Topics
FundsStocksportfolio
coywesley
05-09-2008, 4:15 PM | Post #2516286
| 0 |
  |
|
Dan, Thanks for finding and sharing with us the new Rich Howard fund, PCAFX. I wish it were available at more discount brokerages like Scottrade or Firstrade. The initial minimum of $10,000.00 and subsequent investments of $1000.00 for IRA's are quite alot. Steve, Thanks for the link to that Semi-Annual Report in 2001. PRWCX shareholders were certainly in good hands with Rich Howard then, especially during the Bear Market, and right before 9/11. I hope his attitude then was contagious, and is still the attitude at TRP now with regard to market conditions. Coy
|
Related Topics
FundsPRWCXIRAs
randan
05-09-2008, 8:06 PM | Post #2516321
| 0 |
  |
|
Steve, I would like to come back at ya and say $250k is only 2.54% of my equities but that would be a bold faced lie (at least until I hit the Mega millions jackpot later tonight!). I have brokerage accounts at Fidelity and T Rowe and I couldn't purchase at Fidelity :) Coy, I am cash heavy in two deferred accounts and have been looking to add a fund to an account where I have to take yearly RMD. For this, I want a fairly conservative dividend oriented fund. I can't find anything as of yet on after expense yield but it seems to have held up well considering it opened September of last year and Mr Market has not been particularly kind since then. It also appears to be a go anywhere fund but with a little over 50% in small and mid caps which is also where I am light. I am not yet sure on this fund (or their small cap fund by the same managers) but it is definitely on my radar screen for the next major correction which in my very uneducated opinion is a given (forward looking markets or not). Best, Dan
|
Related Topics
managersbrokerageFidelity
coywesley
05-09-2008, 8:34 PM | Post #2516323
| 0 |
  |
|
I bounced around a little on the prospectorfunds.com website. I found in the Statement of Additional Information, pgs 23-23, that Rich Howard was born in 1946. So he's 62. I wonder how many years it'll be before he retires. The other two managers were born in 1963 (Kevin O'Brian), and 1959 (John Gillespie). I found in the latest Prospectus, page 6, dated Apr.28, 2008, some disturbing operating expenses: Management Fees...............1.10% 12b-1 Fees..........................0.25% Other Expenses..................4.16% Total Annual Expenses.........5.51% Expense Reimbursement.....(4.01%) Net Annual Expenses...........1.50% The Expense Cap can remain in effect until the third anniversary of the commenced operation date. That is, unless the Board of Directors approve a termination or revision. I think I'll pass for now, but I did add it to one of my Watch Lists. Coy
|
Related Topics
managers
randan
05-09-2008, 8:58 PM | Post #2516327
| 0 |
  |
|
I would think Other Expenses also include start up costs for a new company although I am not sure. Probably those would have to be recouped b4 expenses decline and hopefully prior to three years. Two plus years to go before I would have to worry about it and since the TRP culture hopefully permeates the firm, I doubt if one has to worry about excessively high expense ratios. Again, I don't really know. Dan
|
| 0 |
  |
|
Good find on the expenses Coy. My "guess" would be that Prospector Capital Appreciation would continue to keep the expenses capped at 1.50%, or even reduce it when and if the asset base grows. Most, if not all, actively managed mutual funds have some sort of cap on their total expenses. I'm also going to pass on PCAFX for now but I am definitely interested in any fund that Rich Howard has a say in. From the little I read on the Prospector web site, Gillespie is the "lead" manager. Regarding expenses..... Note the 11.28% annualized Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets before expense reimbursement from the Annual Report dated 12/31/07: SUPPLEMENTAL
DATA AND RATIOS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
assets, end of period (in thousands)
|
|
$ |
8,168
|
|
|
Ratio
of expenses to average net assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before
expense reimbursement
|
|
|
11.28 |
%(3) |
|
After
expense reimbursement
|
|
|
1.50 |
%(3) |
|
Ratio
of net investment income (loss) to average net assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before
expense reimbursement
|
|
|
(9.38 |
)%(3) |
|
After
expense reimbursement
|
|
|
0.40 |
%(3) |
|
Portfolio
turnover rate
|
|
|
5 |
%(2) |
|
Related Topics
Capital Appreciationtarget
kchnew
06-07-2008, 10:21 PM | Post #2526102
| 0 |
  |
|
Hi Dan, where did you buy TPSMX at less than 250K? I checked both Fidelity and TRP, both have 250k minimum. Thanks!
|
Related Topics
Fidelity
|
|
|