Liberalone:

Flakey:  This liberal would definitely agree with your comment which, unlike Fox news, was "balanced."  Its slant is as clear as that of, say, Rush Limbaugh.  Similarly, it can be said, as clear as the slant of an opposing view presented by Keith Olberman (sp?).  The underlying dynamic of your comment reflects the preferred definition of a "liberal."  Though some conservatives also reflect this definition, the liberals with whom many of us identify relect the definition "A liberal is one who is open to the validity of a variety of viewpoints on a topic."  Extreme left and right wing people accept only their own view, though this extremism is typically associated with right wingers who view liberals as soft-minded or left-wingers who view right wingers as overly rigid.  The true liberal or conservative recognizes that to group all liberals or all conservatives as singular groups is an over simplification of a very complex issue!

Terrorist in the past, during Dem control of our government, were able to hide in their vagueness.  Dem Lawyers said, "if you can't prove they did it, even though they said that they did, you can't prosecute them". 

Libs try the same thing with their Socialist political agenda.  They want to give he illusion that they are Centrist, while attempting to re-engineer society with redistribution of income.

Yes, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is a duck.  Libs want to call in some other thing, anything other than what it is.

Why won't libs just be honest about their political ideology?  Why do they hide out as "centrist"?