|
|
|
|
T/A 7/08 How Low Can We Go?????
|
uncleharley
06-21-2008, 9:43 AM | Post #2530913 |
583 Replies
| 18 |
  |
|
|
Before we can establish where we are going we have to agree on where we have been and where we are now. That excersize will establish the trend that we are currently in. The stock market, as measured by the S&P 500 peaked in price at about 1570 in early Oct '07. The S&P 500 has been setting a series of lower highs since then. Volume peaked in Jan '08 has has been declining since then. Money Flow into the S&P 500 peaked in April of '07 and has been trending down since then. Currently there is more money flowing out of the S&P on a daily basis, than there is coming in, creating a negative money flow situation. The above paragraph clearly establishs that we are in a bear market with the intermediate term trend in prices being down. This is confirmed by the trends in volume and money flow. By using a technique called the Measured Move Theory, we can use the above data to make an informed projection of where we are going and how long it will take to get there. The theory states that each leg down and subsequent rally will be of approximate equal length and duration. We also know that all groups in nature come in odd numbers [Fibonacci circa 1200???]. Consequently since we have begun the 2nd leg down, we know that we will enjoy at least 3 legs down in this bear market. It could be 5 or 7, but it will not be 2 or 4 or 6. The last leg down was about 300 S&P points and took about 6 months to complete. The subsequent rally was about 200 points and took about 3 months to complete. By applying the above data to the Measured Move Theory we can see that the current leg down will carry us to the 1150 level on the S&P 500 and should be complete in late Oct or early Nov. We will then have a rally of about 200 points to 1350 which should put us just into the new year. The 3rd leg down will take us to about 1000 on the S&P by early summer of '09. We should then enjoy a summer rally. A 4th and 5th legs down are difficult to predict at this point, but you can see how the theory works. I always like to confirm my prognostications before I tell anyone about them so I did check a long term chart to see if the projected levels coinside with previously established support/resistance lines and yes, they do. uh
|
Related Topics
chartdurationNovthe stock marketvolume
DrHelen
06-24-2008, 5:36 AM | Post #2531826
| 0 |
  |
|
I think Snark, like me, is a little confused by a July T/A thread already 30 posts long on June 24th. Is this an omen of some sort? And if so, what does it mean? Have we seen it before? I haven't been here long enough to know the history. It is a great, if discouraging, discussion anyway. Today is not going to be any fun; I think I'll go to the beach. DrH
|
|
Re: Are commodities topping?
|
AKHalea
06-24-2008, 6:15 AM | Post #2531828
| 0 |
  |
|
MP : A few answers to your question. - Saudis do not have much light sweet crude production. 95% of their production is "sour", a less desirable (lower sulfur) grade. Of that 95%, about 75% is light sour, meaning not as difficult to refine. The rest is heavy sour. Until recently, this was the pattern, but it might change this year in Sep when they bring in some more light sour production.
- Most refineries can run some sour crude, some can run more than others. However when we run refineries at 90+% utilization, most refineries generally have used up their sour crude capacity (because sour crude is cheaper). Thus, at current ~87%+ utilization, many refiners would prefer the light sweet variety that is easier to refine, but more expensive.
- Thus, Saudis may have a problem of not enough buyers for their additional production. This will hopefully bring down the price of heavy sour grads in relation to lighter grades. That. hopefully is how we may get a start towards lower crude prices.
The title of my post was meant to stimulate discussion - as you say, we may just be taking a breather or may be starting a true decline. However, in view of many fundamentals, I feel that we may be in the 8th or 9th innings of this oil bull run, rather than 5/6th inning. So, we must decide which way to go when we come to that unevitable fork in the road. Cheers .... Anil
|
Related Topics
OilSep
bythenbrs
06-24-2008, 6:45 AM | Post #2531836
| 0 |
  |
|
AKHalea:So, we must decide which way to go when we come to that unevitable fork in the road.
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it... " Yogi Berra
|
|
Re: Are commodities topping?
|
DeerIslander
06-24-2008, 6:54 AM | Post #2531839
| 0 |
  |
|
China and Rio Tinto just agreed to a 97% increase in the price of iron ore. RIO That is above what most analysts expected and says at least a big portion of the China commodity boom story is alive and well.
|
Related Topics
Chinatargetarticles
|
A Tuesday, Close to July.
|
uncleharley
06-24-2008, 7:31 AM | Post #2531851
| 0 |
  |
|
Sorry DrH, meet me at the Abyss and I'll buy you one. I'm still not sure about commodities, but I will continue to monitor that potential H&S pattern on the CRB. Fwiw, at the present time I only own bear funds, precious metals, and one stock which is a special situation play on cleaner air, [FTEK]. The stock market might give us a rough time today. The futures are predicting a serious gap down on the nasdaq at the open. The S&P will probably do better, but still decline. Europe is in the red as I type and Asia closed decidedly mixed. Oil and precious metals are drifting up. This should be a good day for cash. uh
|
Related Topics
commoditiesthe stock marketbearEuropeprecious metals
DrHelen
06-24-2008, 7:53 AM | Post #2531866
| 0 |
  |
|
A strong second to Anil's view. One of the complexities/risks of investing in foreign cultures in general and China in particular is a very different legal and cultural attitude towards contracts. The deal was struck by Baosteel (Shanghai Baosteel Group Corporation), a state-owned enterprise headquartered in Shanghai. Wikipedia has a good summary of the company's history and the actual site of the company is here. I like the comments on the site about corporate culture: "We carry out mechanism innovation to set up a staff team consistent
with the corporate value orientation and adapted to the corporate
strategic goal; we carry out Party construction innovation to exert the
unique political advantages of Chinese enterprises in the construction
of corporate culture."
In other words, this is very much a state/Party operation--and the history of China simply changing contracts when they want is quite clear. But at the moment this is the standard--I gather, for reasons that I find a bit confusing, that this deal will apply to all customers that buy steel from Rio Tinto and BHP, including US and European purchasers. DrH
|
Related Topics
ChinatargetEuropeanChinese
| 0 |
  |
|
I agree with some of the sentiment expressed here but isn't the salient fact that as of now this 97% increase is the best deal Baosteel could cut? Dr. H -- I believe it applies to other buyers because Baosteel is the biggest buyer of iron ore and if they didn't have the leverage to get a better price how can a smaller buyer demand to pay less successfully? The smaller buyers can try but why would Rio give them a better price than their best customer? I notice that a major Japanese steel company quickly also accepted the agreed upon price. That I believe is the relevant fact for investors today. In short the suppliers continue to control the market as of now -- it seems to me this agreement is definitely not evidence that the iron ore market has topped. Someday it will change .... "But not today" .......Hannibal Lechter.
|
Related Topics
marketleverageiron oresteel
|
Re: Are commodities topping?
|
MasterPlan
06-24-2008, 12:15 PM | Post #2531960
| 0 |
  |
|
AKHalea:MP : A few answers to your question. - Thus,
Saudis may have a problem of not enough buyers for their additional
production. This will hopefully bring down the price of heavy sour
grads in relation to lighter grades. That. hopefully is how we may get
a start towards lower crude prices.
Thanks
Anil. Off the top of your head, do you know of a site that gives
those prices? If not, no big deal. Will probably be an easy
enough search on Google. As for the Chinese ore
situation...one thing that hasn't been mentioned here is that when prices
get too high, that can force economic change. There is some talk
that China may go back into it's own mines and ramp up production. Not
likely since they have a lesser grade of ore. But if push comes
to shove... But a new and REAL development is happening in the
shipping market... Involving the producers who are shipping this iron
ore. In the past, they (Vale, Rio, BHP etc.) relied on
external shipping fleets, but now that the price of freight has gone
sky-high, some of the iron ore producers are developing their own
fleets. If enough of them do it, that can change the dynamics of
the shipping market. That can force rates down and Australia will be
less compelled to charge China a "freight premium". That in turn
will bring iron ore prices down.
So again, high prices can be the mother of invention... Not
sure there's a bottom-line point here for commodities. Just
saying that looking at one change in the system isn't necessarily
meaningful. For every action, there's a reaction.
Eventually, the supply-demand balance gets back into equilibrium.
|
Related Topics
commoditiesChinaChinesegoogleiron ore
|