[quote user="bobbinm"]
You will, however, have a hard time convincing me that those who are buying rice, wheat and corn ( or oil) now are buying because the commodities are " just so damned cheap " .
[/quote]
Well, I certainly do think so. The key question to ask is, cheap *compared to what*? Tangible assets of all kinds except real estate seem cheap to me, compared to paper assets of all kinds. "Feel" is not exactly scientific, but let me give you an example or two.
One, have you ever tried buying a *large quantity* of any commodity? I mean for actual physical delivery. If you do, you will have a little revelation, supply tends to be very restricted nowadays, it's not a matter of how much it costs but how much can you get and when, regardless of price, and this is true for many different kinds of commodities. I know of a number of producers who are rationing deliveries to their larger customers, and large deliveries are routinely behind by months; but for a small customer, the appearance of unlimited supply still exists. Commodities have been so cheap for so long that investment in additional capacity has seriously lagged, and now there is minimal (or no) excess capacity for many things.
Two, consider that any number of key commodities are in fact so cheap that a small hedge fund can buy the worldwide total supply for the next ten or twenty years out of petty cash. Case in point, selenium, total production 1500 tons/year, total value of that today is a mere $100M, how on earth is that not cheap? We're talking about something that has NO substitute in animal feed, fertilizer, and human nutritional supplements (arguably other uses like steel and glass-making can be substituted). There has to be some kind of balance between how important something is (extremely), how easy it is to substitute (not possible), and how much it costs ($30/lb??).
Same for oil, only on a much larger scale. If China thought that oil was running out, how much could they buy using their foreign currency (mostly dollar) reserves if they made a private offer to the Saudis to buy all their future production for some period of time, at let's say double or triple today's spot price?
[quote user="bobbinm"]
The proliferation of dollars into hedge funds has increased from something under a trillion dollars in 2004 to almost 3 trillion by the end of 2007. These dollars have to find a home. It seems to me that many of these fund managers, or their computers, all chase the same asset.
[/quote]
Sort of true, but they don't do so because they're stupid, they do it because it is an undervalued asset. See above.
[quote user="bobbinm"]
I believe this speculation creates inflationary pressure, causing particular prices to increase above their true value (real value - adjusted for inflation) simply because the speculative purchasing artificially increases the demand.
[/quote]
"True value"? Prices don't measure value. Price is determined by availability as well as "value". Also, nothing guarantees that all prices must move together in step with the general "inflation" level. If the usefulness of something goes up or availability goes down, prices can increase - and *stay* there - without any regard for general "inflation".
[quote user="bobbinm"]
Don't you agree that price rises due to speculative purchasing causes further speculative purchasing in the hope that the price will continue to rise? Isn't this how "bubbles" form? [/quote]
Speculators who do that tend to lose all their money rather quickly. It's natural selection in action. I am fairly sure that this is not what we are seeing in the commodities space today.
[quote user="bobbinm"]
I'm not convinced getting between farmers and consumers, taking money from both sides, is really as altruistic as you claim. [/quote]
The alternative being periodic famines, I'd have to disagree. Of course it doesn't have to be *entirely* altruistic, but altruism does play a part.