Since AWP still had not yet IPO'd at the time of your post #4, I could only conclude that the information provided was
-1- very general and/or
-2- merely the
red herring provided in an IPO to prospective investors.
Once an IPO has come to pass, the red herring aka preliminary prospectus is obsolete and an actual prospectus with more complete data is made available to the public.
An issuing company cannot actively solicit investors. Exactly
how they are legally allowed to drum up business for an IPO is like walking a fine line. This applies to ALL issuers of all types... bonds, stocks, ETFs, CEFs and OEFs, etc. IMO, internet access to company websites makes it even more difficult for them to define what and
when any information, however vague (ie red herrings), is allowed to be placed on their websites.
Some companies prefer to interpret the laws in the very strictest sense. For example, even when I knew MAPIX Matthews Asia Pacific Equity Income's IPO was imminent, the matthewsfunds.com site didn't even have a whisper that the fund existed. When I called to confirm why they had not even a blurb about it on the site, I was told that they could give general replies to direct unsolicited questions and nothing else.
I hope this clarifies my #14 reply. If you found it condescending, that was not my intent.
Regards,
Susan
Originally posted in thread: 1746