It sounds like you know Morningstar's take on the issue, so I won't belabor it more here.
However, for me personally, I would never use chart techniques to trade stocks. (I did it exactly once in my life, mostly as an experiment, and I'd rather forget that episode altogether!)
Anyhow, I guess it all comes down to your view of stocks. I personally believe that stocks represent shares of underlying businesses, and the whole point of buying them is if the market is not really discounting how the business will perform correctly. Charts pretty much never give me the information I need. However, if you view stocks as nothing more than trading vehicles, then perhaps chart reading is the correct way to go.
A more nuanced interpretation of the chart reading would point out that how a stock trades is indicative of market psychology and market knowledge. (for example, if you see accumulation of stock in a certain pattern, perhaps knowledgeable insiders are buying the thing up in anticipation of good business performance?). But the bottom line, I feel, is that charts are just too chaotic and complicated. Often, given a certain pattern, there are a number of differing and conflicting interpretations. How do you separate them out, and which interpretation is the correct one? I've never been able to tell beforehand.
Then again, maybe that's why I work at Morningstar and not at some quant shop!