Lehman, Treasury, Fed Have Lost Control Of The Game
MishShedlock
08-25-2008, 11:23 AM | Post #2553944 |
0 Replies
Analyst Richard Bove has stated
Lehman CEO Richard Fuld has "lost control of the game."
That is something I completely agree with as it should be obvious to
all. Bove went on to say "If he doesn't do something this weekend, as
of next week, the game is on." That makes absolutely no sense. Nor does
Bove's price target of $20 per share.
Yes, Lehman has been
shopping around for buyers, but buyers have been balking. I talked
about Lehman talks collapsing and how poorly Lehman's preferreds trade
in
Ten Financial Entities On The Brink.
Lehman's Crown Jewel For SaleFive days ago in a
will he, won't he debate Financial News reported
Lehman Brothers to keep Neuberger Berman unit.
Lehman
Brothers is not looking to sell Neuberger Berman, an asset management
business, according to analysts who met with Herbert McDade, the bank's
new president and chief operating officer.So much for that idea.
CNBC is reporting
Lehman May Have Trouble Selling Neuberger Stake.
The
same way sovereign funds balked over Lehman Brothers CEO Dick Fuld's
terms to sell them a chunk of the firm, some private equity firms are
balking over Fuld's terms to sell them a part of Lehman's investment
management business, which includes the firm's crown jewel, the
Neuberger & Berman asset management unit, sources have told CNBC.
As
first reported by CNBC, Fuld, Lehman's long-time chief executive, is
looking to sell a 70 percent stake in the investment management
division and have an option to buy it back at a later date. As a carrot
to the potential buyer is a warrant to purchase a 20 percent stake in
Lehman that could be cashed in when the credit crisis abates and the
firm's stock price recovers.
But potential buyers—which include
nearly every major private equity firm—are starting to balk at Lehman's
initial offer, according to Wall Street executives familiar with the
matter.
Their problem is the price. Lehman is pricing the
investment management division at around $10 billion, meaning a 70
percent stake would cost $7 billion. But the real cost will be much
more than that, because asset management firms are only worth something
if employees remain with them following such a transaction. Potential
bidders believe that unless they set up a large retention
pool—something in the neighborhood of $400 million to $500 million to
keep employees at their jobs—the talent will walk, these people say.
Meanwhile,
many of the firm retail brokers, who are part of the firm's investment
management division, have been offered jobs by the likes of Morgan
Stanley, plus bonuses to jump ship. Without a retention package, many
might just leave Lehman, particularly as the firm's prospects grow
dimmer.
Fuld Wants His Cake And Eat It TooNeuberger Berman is clearly on the block but no one wants to pay what Fuld is asking.
Fuld
is trying to sell something that is worth more to him than to any
potential buyer, at a price that is clearly too high. He also wants an
option to buy it back later. In other words he wants downside
protection while capping someone else's gain. He is in no position to
be asking for such terms and everyone knows it.
Korea Back In The GameBloomberg is reporting
Lehman Rises After Korea Bank Comment on Investment.
Aug.
22 (Bloomberg) -- Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., the fourth-largest
U.S. securities firm, rose the most in two weeks in New York trading
after Korea Development Bank said it's "considering" an investment in
the company.
Lehman climbed $1.44 to $15.16 at 11:43 a.m. in New
York Stock Exchange composite trading, after reaching $15.93. Shares of
the New York-based firm dropped almost 80 percent this year before
today, the worst-performer on the 11-company Amex Securities
Broker/Dealer Index.
"KDB is considering all kinds of options,
including Lehman Brothers," a KDB spokesman said today, declining to
elaborate. A Reuters report earlier today cited a spokesman saying that
the government-controlled bank is "open to" possibilities, including a
purchase of Lehman.
"I would be very surprised by any deal that
would lead to complete control," said Stuart Eizenstat, a partner at
Covington & Burling LLP in Washington and former U.S. Deputy
Secretary of the Treasury. "That would elicit a lot of questions and
political blowback. I'm sure that's not going to happen."
Is This Good News?
The
stock is reacting as if this is good news. Most likely it is not. If
the deal happens, and that is a big if, it is likely to cause massive
shareholder dilution at a price far lower than $15 per share. Didn't we
just go through this at $28 a share?
One key point here that
none of the articles above have addressed is that it's not just Lehman
that has lost control. The Treasury and the Fed have lost control as
well. If there are no US buyers, and I believe it would be a good thing
if there are not, neither the Treasury or the Fed is in a position to
bail out Lehman.
The reality, if one thinks about it closely, is
the Fed and the Treasury never had control of anything in the first
place. It was all an illusion that has now been unmasked.
The
Fed and Treasury may not like it one bit, but the flood of dollars
those dollars foreigners are sitting on eventually have to come home.
And they will come home by buying US assets. That is the price the US
has to pay for the unsustainable US credit binge we have been on. So if
a huge deal with Korea is announced, expect to see the Treasury begging
Congress to approve it.
In June 2008, Bernanke Blamed Saving Glut For Housing Bubble.
It is amazing that anyone, let alone a Fed Chairman, can possibly think
that a crack-up consumption boom in the US, financed by cheap credit
from foreigners can constitute a "savings glut". Bernake is clearly
incompetent.
In the past few months, Singapore, Abu Dhabi, and
now South Korea have or are considering "bailing out" US corporations.
This is what's become of Bernanke's ridiculous "savings glut" theory.
Originally posted at: http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/